>>203633499
Too late. You've already exposed your faggotry.>>203625136
Based>>203633330
lmao>>203633040
Based.
>>203632414
>Wong Kar-Wai
He's always been aesthetically shit.
>>203633333
Bresson obviously, with Preminger as second.>>203633671
>He's always been aesthetically shit.
He's the greatest aestheticist alive besides Lynch./lmao/>>203633710
like Malick, he just makes perfume commercials>>203633889
Quite literally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WvSSjhmOmIthat perfume merchant MalickYes, yes, it's not shitty enough, we needed the eternal schizo to start going raging about Malick againTo The Wonder and Song to Song are sitting on my PC waiting to be watched but I don't know if I should even waste my time after the shitshow that was Knight of Cups>>203633956
Perfume postcards, the worst kind>>203633930
can i log this?>>203634015
Why did you dislike it??>>203634015
You’re damaging your hard drive just having that filth sitting on there, delete it NOWNEW

>>203634052
>>203634052
>>203634052
>>203634052

NEW>>203634020
don't think so>>203633418
When I post a film I like, I’ll reply to myself just to shit on it first, this way nobody else can take away what’s mine
I thought everyone did this?then i won't watch>>203634157
ok>>203634157
/film/ in a nutshell>>203634015
If you failed to appreciate Knight of Cups, then for sure don't bother, it's not for you.>>203634307
How can you fail to appreciate something that isn’t worth appreciating?>>203634421
Do we really need this song and dance every time?>>203632759
The director indeed should not have any say in this.>>203634918
Exactly, they only direct it. Only /film/ intellectuals should decide what goes in or out in remasterings and restorations.>>203635146
The only one who should decide is the film itself, by the way it looked when it first came out. You do know what the word "restoration" means, don't you?>>203635302
Agreed, we need to have more discussions with the films and let them speak for themselves>>203635354
Yes, the way every not director-approved restoration does.>>203635302
Just as much as I hope you know what director means. He (or a DP) is the one who knows what he wants the film to look. I don't assume bad faith on their parts.>>203635445
I wouldn't necessarily call it bad faith, but we've gone through shit like >>203632414 a bit too often sadly.

next

/film/

Thread for classics and arthouseMentally ill edition>/film/ chartshttps://mega.nz/folder/87xyiJjZ#3B2eXe2lmN2KbFNNEagggQ>/film/ literaturehttps://mega.nz/folder/XCokCRpR#tlesB0J_7jhaEWZVJqVzlAPrevious: >>203588371

< Go back

Thread for classics and arthouse

Mentally ill edition

>/film/ charts
https://mega.nz/folder/87xyiJjZ#3B2eXe2lmN2KbFNNEagggQ
>/film/ literature
https://mega.nz/folder/XCokCRpR#tlesB0J_7jhaEWZVJqVzlA

Previous: >>203588371