>>102418684
>Literally beats CRT in everything except motion, viewing angles and muh glow and bleed.
Well, those faults. Contrast possibly though too, while that 2000:1 sounds impressive in paper, I've been described that it looks "30% better than a standard 1000:1 one", and as I established a 1000:1 IPS already looks quite shit. But I don't have one, can't compare to my tubes.
>Doesn't matter when you don't know what correct looks like, sure.
Possibly yea, someone who does color critical work for their job would perhaps notice some inadequacies with the colors. It's usually bright pure reds that CRTs struggle with, they tend to look more orange instead.
The only monitor I have that kind of looks impressive similarly to a CRT is that CCFL-VA panel, as it cheats by having utterly radioactive oversaturated colors, primaries with hues nowhere close where they should be. IPS panels always fall flat, they look shallow and uninteresting, even if they technically measure great.>>102418943
>It's usually bright pure reds that CRTs struggle with
well, that's not just a CRT problem, only recently did they figure out how to make IPS panels with vivid reds. I have one of those newer panels with vivid reds and it's a tradeoff, the red transitions slower than the green and blue which is VERY noticeable as red ghosting if you use the strobing feature>>102406310
>>102406338
>it's been 10 years since Chaika ended
weird feeling>>102419264
speaking of chaika, wtf happened here? time travel?
>>102413390
>>102413398

next

CRTs are beautifull

< Go back